A tool for UCI faculty, from Wave AI Solutions — not a UCI product.
Spend less time grading. Keep every academic decision.
Gradebot prepares preliminary, rubric-based scores and feedback for faculty or TA review. You decide what changes, what is approved, and what students receive through Canvas.
School of Social EcologySummer 2026 pilot approved · Fall 2026 moving forward

- UCI pilot approvedSocial Ecology · Summer 2026
- Faculty-controlledAccept, edit, or reject every output
- Students stay in CanvasNo Gradebot student accounts
- Private by designStudent submissions are never used to train AI models
A simple faculty workflow
From Canvas submission to faculty-approved feedback
Use Gradebot for one assignment, shadow grading, or a broader pilot — you set the rubric, and you make every final decision.

Select the assignment
Choose the Canvas assignment and provide the rubric or grading criteria you already use.

Gradebot prepares a first pass
Receive preliminary scores, rubric-aligned reasoning, and editable feedback for each submission.

You review and approve
Faculty or TAs accept, edit, or reject the output before final grades or feedback reach students.
Nothing is released to students automatically.
Professor Teresa DaltonCriminology, Law and Society · University of California, IrvineI love, love, love this software! It is pretty easy to use, and I have not received one student complaint or follow-up question. Amazing! I have held the system up to a very rigorous review; it has passed in every category.
Why instructors try Gradebot
Less repetitive work. More time for teaching.
Recover grading time
Start from a structured first pass instead of rebuilding the same feedback across dozens of submissions.
Stay aligned to your rubric
Trace preliminary scores and feedback back to the criteria you chose for the assignment.
Keep full editorial control
Review every result, revise wording, change scores, or reject the output entirely.
Support varied assignments
Use it for essays, case analyses, reports, quantitative problems, and programming work.
Built for responsible faculty use
AI assistance without giving up academic judgment
Gradebot supports grading work; it does not replace the instructor's authority or responsibility for final grades.
Current UCI status
Summer 2026 Social Ecology pilot: approved.
Fall 2026: approval moving forward.
Preliminary output only
Every suggested score and comment remains subject to faculty or TA review.
Faculty chooses what students see
No feedback is released without the instructor's approval.
No model training on student submissions
Student submissions are never used to train, fine-tune, or improve any AI model.
Start with one assignment
Instructors can begin with shadow grading before deciding whether to use Gradebot more broadly.
These four are the short version — the full data-handling commitments live in our Privacy Policy.
Common questions
What UCI instructors should know
Is Gradebot approved at UCI?
Gradebot is approved for a Summer 2026 pilot in the UCI School of Social Ecology, and approval for Fall 2026 is moving forward. The Gradebot team can support instructors through the applicable process.
Does Gradebot decide students' final grades?
No. Gradebot prepares preliminary, rubric-based scores and feedback. Faculty or TAs remain responsible for reviewing the work and determining every final grade.
What do students need to do?
Students continue submitting assignments and receiving final grades through Canvas. They do not need Gradebot accounts.
Can I test it without committing to a full course?
Yes. You can begin with one assignment or use Gradebot for shadow grading, with its output used only for comparison.
See Gradebot with a real faculty workflow
A focused demo, on your own assignment if you bring one. See exactly what Gradebot drafts and what stays in your hands.
Exploring Fall 2026? Approval is moving forward, and the prior UCI review may help streamline the process.